

The Future of the Canadian Championship
By: Lee | July 3rd, 2009
In its first two seasons, the Canadian Championship has provided entertaining soccer, memorable moments and has advanced the prominence of the club game in this country. In response to its success (and failures), there has been talk of changing the format and expanding it to include teams from lower leagues such as the CSL and PDL.
While I definitely think the tournament should expand, I would be reluctant to include CSL or lower level teams. While it would be intriguing to see our own version of Havant and Waterlooville vs. Liverpool, I don’t think the game has grown enough yet for such a match to attract enough fans/media coverage. Look at the struggles of the US Open Cup. Nobody is going to pay to see TFC play Italia Shooters. While I think most soccer fans would eventually like the Canadian Championship to become something like the FA Cup, for now the tournament should only include MLS and USL1 teams.
However, that does not mean we’re stuck with a three team round robin until soccer becomes the biggest summer sport in the country. With Vancouver going to MLS in 2011 and serious talk of USL expanding to Victoria, the format of competition will have to change. A four-team round robin, home-and-away format will not work: the champion could already be decided by the fourth game (out of 6). It would also be difficult to schedule 12 games.

One realistic option is to have an aggregate knock out format. This way every team is guaranteed a home game and the Champion has to play an adequate number of games. In the first round, the USL teams could be paired up with the MLS teams to make things fair. The only drawback of this format is that the final is decided on aggregate instead of a single, decisive game.

Another option would be a page-playoff format, similar to what curling and the Australian A-League use. In this format, the MLS teams would play each other in an aggregate series and the winner would get a bye to the final. The loser would then play the winner of the USL aggregate series to decide who goes to the final. The final would also be decided home-and-away to ensure the champion plays at least four games.
Each option has its advantages and disadvantages. I prefer the aggregate knockout format as the page-playoff system rewards the MLS teams, which I believe goes against the spirit of cup competitions. Also, it may be difficult to schedule the additional two games needed in the page-playoff format.
What are your thoughts? How do you think the Canadian Championship should grow?
| EPL Match Schedule | Discount Travel to London & Arsenal | |||
| Arsenal Scores | Emirates Stadium information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments | Add your comment
-



What’s the problem of having the final decided on aggregate instead of a single decisive game?
The CONCACAF Champions League final is based on aggregate as well.
Playing an aggregate final will allow both home fans base to see their teams in the final.
An aggregate final also avoids the corruption (i.e. TV network’s influence) associated to award the field for a single final, unless it’s played at a neutral site, which then is not fair to the home fans for both teams.
Posted from
United States

-



The only problem with an aggregate final is if the first match is a blowout the second match loses a lot of its entertainment value. Then again, as we saw in this year’s championship that big deficits can be reversed.
Posted from
United States

-



I think that one-off finals are the best way to create the pure tension and drama that a cup final should have. Even in sports with best-of-seven playoffs, game 7 is always considered more exciting than ending a finals series in four, five, or even six days.
Also, I think that it is important at this time in the tourney’s life that all of the teams should play each other, so that there is rivalry. I don’t think that a four team home-and-away round-robin is too many. Maybe cap group size at 4 with a knockout final. I think that there’s not enough professional teams to contest a noteworthy competition until we have eight or sixteen.
Posted from
Canada

-



Oh yeah, USL might expand to Victoria? Any word about Ottawa by any chance? haha.
I think one-off finals should always be the way to go if possible, but with Canada being such a geographically large country, and with the tourney still being so young, I would say that aggregate finals might be the better way to go. I’m thinking of a tourney like the Asian Champions League as a similar case, a huge distance for fans to fly, and not a big enough tourney to have a single final.
Posted from
United States

Leave a Reply
If you have not commented here before, please take a moment to peruse ourCommenting Guidelines.












